(Washington DC) – Legal scholar Jonathan Turley has fired White House press secretary Jane Sackie for making false claims to confuse her with a scandal involving Hunter Biden.
Turley writes: “After the New York Times acknowledged that the Hunter Beaden laptop has always been genuine, the Beaden White House radio has gone silent – and some journalists are pressuring the president for an answer. There was confusion (as President Biden did).
He now says it would be inappropriate for him to address his earlier comments on the scandal. Fortunately, no one ran into the local ice cream shop, but reports of additional evidence obtained on Hunter Biden in the ongoing criminal investigation are causing the silence to falter.
“He was not so restrained when Saki spread the false story (as opposed to a search by American intelligence) that it was a hoax. He declared,” I think it is widely known and widely known that in 2020 there was a wide range of Russian confusion. “
“Now that his statements (and the president’s) have been recognized as untrue, Saki will not enjoy the questions, with the answers” “I will direct you to the representatives of the judiciary and Hunter Biden.”
“Of course, the judiciary will not comment on the pending investigation. The question, however, was, ironically, about his own role in spreading confusion.
“Radio silence is deafening as new reports indicate that the grand jury is continuing to drill down on Hunter Biden’s money. As we discussed earlier, the woman who had a child married to Hunter Biden documented her financial statements to the grand jury.
“Significantly, Clinton Lancaster, an attorney for Lunden Roberts, told CNBC he” offered a significant amount. [Biden’s] In response to a subpoena, investigators said he had “financial records” and that Hunter Biden would be charged.
“With the growing possibility of accusations, the media has to try to clear the long campaign of these false claims. However, the current authentic emails do not address what the Biden family says about the impact pedaling schemes, “he wrote.
Saki was recently asked about Hunter and he quickly escaped the question.
Reporter Steven Nelson said: “I have received two questions about a quick explanation and a conflict of interest with the President on foreign affairs. The first brief explanation is this: The New York Times reported this week that the first son is under criminal investigation. Does the president still want to stay away from that case?
Pasaki: “Yes. It’s the judiciary, and I’ll direct you to them.”
Nelson said: “And I have two questions about the conflict of interest in foreign affairs. First, I have a question about Russia and then China.
“On Russia: You told me last year that you were unfamiliar with a Senate report alleging that a company affiliated with First Year – or First Year – received $ 3.5 million from Russia’s richest woman.
“Subsequent reports indicate that President Biden had dinner with the same woman in Georgetown in 2015, when he was vice president.
“Hey, Yelena Baturina, the US government has not yet approved her. How is President Biden navigating the conflict of interest in approving people who have done business with his family? And can you explain to us what this 3.5 3.5 million is for?
PSAKI: “I have no confirmation of the accuracy of that report, so I have no further details.
Post Jonathan Turley Jane Saki Bust: “Saki was not so restrained when he was spreading lies” first appeared in MAGA Conservative.